REVERSE the orders granting the motions to dismiss AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

PickerH:

, J.

Saitta

PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent Wells Fargo lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly,

P concur in the disposition of this appeal.

et--00teL,Scsrs. , J.

Parraguirre cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Howard Kim & Associates Buckley Madole, P.C.

Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA OM 1947A e