dismiss, AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.'

J.

Pickering

J.

Saitta

PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Law Offices of Noggle Law PLLC Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

'The injunction imposed by our April 7, 2014, order is vacated.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 194M