Bourne Valley Ct. Trust v. Jp Morgan Mortg. Trust 2004-S2
Bourne Valley Ct. Trust v. Jp Morgan Mortg. Trust 2004-S2
Opinion
REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.'
J.
Pickering r.
Saitta
PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent JP Morgan lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.
Parraguirre cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. The Castle Law Group, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk
'The injunction imposed by our February 10, 2014, order is vacated.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.