Sfr Investments Pool 1 v. First Horizon

VACATE the order denying preliminary injunctive relief AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Hardesty

/.744-1 Douglas

CHERRY, J., concurring:

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

Cherry

C h2artAte. , J. cc: Hon. Allan R Earl, District Judge

Howard Kim & Associates Ballard Spahr, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A skiej(4