Park v. Bank of America, N.A.

the pleadings, AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order. steo-4; ,J. Hardesty

J. Douglas

CHERRY, J., concurring

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool I, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent Bank of America lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

Ck J. Cherry cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge

Kang & Associates PLLC Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A Wel(M.