REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.'

J.

Hardesty

J.

Douglas

CHERRY, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. US. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent Nationstar lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

Chut.

Cherry

cc: Hon. Stefany, Miley, District Judge Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. The Castle Law. Group, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

'The injunction imposed by our October 18, 2013, order is vacated.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A (e-