REVERSE the judgment on the pleadings AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Ac Hardesty rin_41; , J.

Douglas 20404 J.

CHERRY, J., concurring.

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Greene Infuso, LLP Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A