REVERSE the judgment on the pleadings AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

i c, „Ft Hardesty ,te; , J.

J.

CHERRY, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

Ck J.

Cherry

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. Smith Larsen & Wixom Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I 947A egi,