Villa Vecchio Ct Trust v. Deutsche Bank

REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

,J. Hardesty Douglas

CHERRY, J., concurring:

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent Deutsche Bank lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

J. cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge

Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Kravitz, Schnitzer & Johnson, Chtd.

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A