Phenix (Raymond) v. State
Phenix (Raymond) v. State
Opinion
An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
SUPREME Comm OF NEVADA an mm
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA RAYMOND GENE PHENIX, Petitioner, ‘ WLEB THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 66928 DEC 1 l] 301‘: ERA Ec UNE‘EMAN ELE E ‘ R m .J%WVL— DEPUTV CLERK.
ORDER DENYING PETITJON This is a proper person petition for extraordinary relief.
Petitioner challenges the resolution of his direct appeal in Phenix v. State, 114 Nev. 116, 954 P.2d 7'39 (1998), and the appellate proceedings. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claime raised therein} we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in thiematter. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED“
Pickering cc: Raymond Gene Phenix Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk 14027
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.