Samuell (Neill) v. State
Samuell (Neill) v. State
Opinion
a writ of habeas corpus is not available to prisoners who have completed the sentence imposed by the judgment of conviction and are no longer in custody. 2 See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6G); NRS 34.724(1); Jackson v. State, 115 Nev. 21, 23, 973 P.2d 241, 242 (1999). Therefore, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion, and we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
debt J.
Pickering (4 -411 Saitta
cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Neill Samuell Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
2It does not appear that appellant's claims fit within the scope of a petition for a writ of coram nobis. See Trujillo v. State, 129 Nev. , 310 P.3d 594, 601 (2013).
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.