Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

State, Dep't of Transp. v. Dist. Ct. (Francois)

State, Dep't of Transp. v. Dist. Ct. (Francois)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided December 12, 2014

State, Dep't of Transp. v. Dist. Ct. (Francois)

Opinion

Moreover, writ relief is generally available only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170; Int? Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558. Generally, an appeal is an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, P.3d at 841.

Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted at this time. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

C.J.

J.

J.

Saitta

cc: Hon. Richard Wagner, District Judge Attorney General/Transportation Division/Carson City RanaIli & Zaniel, LLC/Reno Bradshaw Law LLC Pershing County Clerk

SUPREME Courrr OF NEVADA (0) 1947A cleto

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.