REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND REMAND for proceedings consistent with this order.

Aeileuu,y' , J.

J.

Saitta

PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool I, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

QACt. J.

ParraguCi

cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Kang & Associates PLLC Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 4049.