Nevada Supreme Court, 2015

Moran (Marvin) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Moran (Marvin) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided January 8, 2015
Moran (Marvin) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, and it is within the discretion of this court to determine if a petition will be considered. See Poulos v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 98 Nev. 453, 455, 652 P.2d 1177, 1178 (1982); see also State ex rel. Dep't Transp. v. Thompson, 99 Nev. 358, 360, 662 P.2d 1338, 1339 (1983). Because petitioner has an adequate remedy at law to challenge the district court's ruling by way of an appeal should he be convicted, see Williams v. Eight Judicial Dist. Court, 127 Nev. , 262 P.3d 360, 365 (2011) (emphasizing that "generally this court will not consider writ petitions challenging evidentiary rulings, as those rulings are discretionary and there typically is an adequate remedy in the form of an appeal following an adverse final judgment"), we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Parraguirre

, J.

Douglas cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge

Clark County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A en

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.