Lepley (Brian) v. State

also claimed that the charging document did not list a specific age of the victim, the offense took place in California, counsel was ineffective, he was entitled to additional presentence credit, and the judgment of conviction is not final because it does not state the cost of the psychosexual exam. We decline to consider the merits of these claims as they fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to correct an illegal sentence. See Edwards, 112 Nev. at 708, 918 P,2d at 324. Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

J. Parraguirre

— Thn)1A-1 4724 J. Douglas

2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT

Of

NEVADA (0) I 947A en cc: Hon. Robert W. Lane, District Judge

Brian Eugene Lepley

Nye County District Attorney

Attorney General/Carson City

Nye County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A e