Nevada Supreme Court, 2015

Everest Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Dist. Ct. (Reimers)

Everest Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Dist. Ct. (Reimers)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 2015

Everest Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Dist. Ct. (Reimers)

Opinion

107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851, and it is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Moreover, writ relief is generally available only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558.

Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted at this time. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Parraguirre

Lccp., , J.

Douglas

cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P. Georgeson Angaran, Chtd.

Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Maddox, Segerblom & Canepa, LLP Gordon & Rees, LLP Leverty & Associates Law, Chtd.

Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A mem

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.