Everest Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Dist. Ct. (Reimers)
Opinion
107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851, and it is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Moreover, writ relief is generally available only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558.
Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted at this time. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Parraguirre
Lccp., , J. Douglas cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge
Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P.
Georgeson Angaran, Chtd.
Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg
Maddox, Segerblom & Canepa, LLP
Gordon & Rees, LLP
Leverty & Associates Law, Chtd.
Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A mem
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.