An unpublis ‘l‘ order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA RENARD TRUMAN POLK, No; 66729 ‘ Petitiener, i Wee PAM FEIL; DAWN BEQUE’I‘TE; AND

AARON HARROUN, F l 2 W TRACIE K. LPMCJEMAN PREME mum CLER > F31 BY ‘

DEPUTY CLERK.

ORDER DENYING PE TI TI ON FOR EXTRA ORDINAR Y RELIEF Pro se petitiener has. filed a “Petitien for Judicial Review,” seeking this ceurt’s intervention in the prison grievance process. As petitioner has not met his burden ef demonstrating that our extraordinary intervention is warranted, Pan 9‘ Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 New , 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004}; see NRAP 21(a){1) and

(requiring service on respondents and an appendix that includes all documents “essential to understand the mattere eel: forth in the petition”); Round Hill Gem Improvement Dist. e. Newman, 97 Nev; 601, 604, 637 P.2d 534, 536 {1981) (when factual, rather than legal, issues are presented, this eeurt will not exercise its discretien to consider an original ‘ writ petitions); State v. Cnty. of Douglas, 90 Nev.‘ 272, 276-77, 524 P2d 1271, 1274 (1974) (“this ceurt prefers that such an application [for extraordinary relief] be addressed to the discretion of the appropriate dietrictcourt” in the first instance}, we deny the petition. NRAP 21%){1L It is 30 ORDEREJ'ngm Lew-M”! [ , b‘: QWW J z ' a . nan], I.“ .um‘rnl ! . ’ c], ' 5 Pickering SUPREME COURT 2, New” 1 cc: Renard Truman Polk lemma W» .i