An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA RENARD TRUNIAN POLK, No. 86730 Petitioner, VS. STEPHEN CLARK; DON POAG; AND F a L E 3 JOHN SGOTT’ K FEB 1 2 2015 Reegondents.

TRACE K LlNflEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME CGURT 3‘!

DE PUTY CLERK ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR EXTRAORDIth RELIEF Pro ee petitioner has filed a “Petition for Judicial Review,” whith seeks this court’s intervention in the prison grievance process. As petitinner has not met his burden of demonstrating that our extraordinary intervention is warranted, Pan 1:. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222! 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840: 841, 844 (2004); see NRA}? 21(a)(1) and (4) (requiring service on respondents and an appendix that includes all documents “essential to understand the matters set ferth in the petition”); l Raund Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. U. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 604, 637 P.2d 534, 538 (1981) (when factual, rather than legal, issues are ' presented, this court will not exercise its discretion to consider an original writ petition); State v. Cnty. «32’ Douglas, 90 Nev. 272, 276-77, 524 P.2d 1271, 1274 (1974) (“thie court prefers that such an application [for extraordinary relief] be addressed to the discretion of the apprrjpriate district court” in the first instance), we deny the petitinn. NRAP 21(b){1}.

It is so ORDEREDin-mj fiflmxi ‘ f g l .

Pickering SUPREME COURT or New». l [0) 1947A «We: [5" 7