Nevada Supreme Court, 2015

Arpino v. Edwards

Arpino v. Edwards
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 12, 2015
Arpino v. Edwards

Opinion

NRAP 3A(b)(6) allows for an appeal from a district court order granting or denying a motion to change venue. "If a demand for a change of venue is filed in a timely manner, and no defendants reside in the county in which the action is filed, and that county is not otherwise a proper venue, then removal is mandatory." Washoe Cnty. v. Wildeveld, 103 Nev. 380, 382, 741 P.2d 810, 811 (1987); see also W. Pac. KR. Co. v. Krom, 102 Nev. 40, 42-43, 714 P.2d 182, 184 (1986). Because respondents moved for a change of venue under NRS 13.040, which requires an action to be tried in the county in which defendant resides, appellant bore the burden of proving that the action was commenced within the proper venue. Wildeveld, 103 Nev. at 382, 741 P.2d at 811. Respondents provided affidavits showing that they are both residents of Washoe County, and appellant provided no substantive opposition to respondents' motion. Appellant therefore failed to meet his burden to show that his action was properly commenced in the First Judicial District Court, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 'di

J. Eaitta

Pielk04 1 , J. Pickering

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A e cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge

Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge

John Francis Arpino

Washoe County District Attorney/Civil Division Washoe District Court Clerk

Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A ze

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.