Fraiser v. Fraiser (Child Custody)
Fraiser v. Fraiser (Child Custody)
Opinion
An unpublish d order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
TIMOTHY M. FRAISER, No. 67928 Appellant, vs. ' : BRITNEY L. FRAISER, ? E a” E 3 _ i___ Resgondent. Fgg 1 g 2035 ORDER DISMISSIN G APPEAL The parties have filed a stipulation. to dismiss this appeal. We approve the stipulation and hereby dismiss this appeal. As pravided in the-atlpulaticn, each party shall bear their own costs and fees. NRAP 42(b).
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACIE LINIW BY: W cc: Hon. Charles J‘ Hoskin, District Judge, Family Court Division Pecos Law Gmup Black 8; LoBello Eighth District Court Clerk SUPHEME (mum 0F NEVAUA CLERK’S ORDER fl’W\S;QS£BF_
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.