Woodlands Comm. Bank v. State of Nev. Bd. of Finance

Provider's rating. See Beal, 865 N.E.2d at 1213 ("A reading of the contract should not render any portion meaningless.").

The district court therefore properly granted summary judgment in favor of respondents. 1 See Lake Constr. & Dev. Corp., 621 N.Y.S.2d at 338. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Saitta cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge

Ara H Shirinian, Settlement Judge Ballard Spahr, LLP Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Carson City Clerk 'In light of the parties' contract, summary judgment was also proper with respect to appellant's claim for unjust enrichment. See Leasepartners Corp. v. Robert L. Brooks Trust Dated November 12, 1975, 113 Nev. 747, 755-56, 942 P.2d 182, 187 (1997) ("An action based on a theory of unjust enrichment is not available when there is an express, written contract, because no agreement can be implied when there is an express agreement"); see also PRG Brokerage Inc. v. Aramarine Brokerage, Inc., 968 N.Y.S.2d 439, 441 (App. Div. 2013) (same).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e