Carlini v. Richland Holdings

issues de novo, looking to the language of the agreement and the surrounding circumstances").

Appellant further contends that respondent lacked standing to file the underlying action. The record on appeal demonstrates, however, that Najjar assigned her interest in the contract to respondent, and thus, we conclude that respondent had standing to file the action. See Easton Bus. Opportunities, Inc. v. Town Exec. Suites-E. Marketplace, LLC, 126 Nev. 119, 124, 230 P.3d 827, 830 (2010) (recognizing that a contract "is assignable unless assignment materially changes the terms of the contract or the contract expressly precludes assignment"). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

Saitta

Atieu Cup J. Pickering cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge

Trent Carlini

Bowen Law Offices

Eighth District Court Clerk

'We conclude that appellant's additional arguments lack merit.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A cep