Sardaryan v. Assali
Opinion
transit to or from work ordinarily will not expose the employer to liability" unless the evidence shows that the employee was on a "special errand" for the employer); Evans, 108 Nev. at 1005-06, 842 P.2d at 721-22 (concluding that "an employee who is traveling to or from work is outside the scope of his or her employment unless the employee is performing an errand for the employer or otherwise conferring a benefit upon the employer"). As appellant has conceded that the third party was not working on the day of the accident and has provided no evidence that the third party was on a special errand or on call for Afandi or in the process of responding to an emergency related to Afandi, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
J.
J. Gibbons cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge
Howard Roitman, Settlement Judge
Harold P. Gewerter, Esq., Ltd.
Hall Jaffe & Clayton, LLP
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1.947A
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.