proceedings. See Dornbach v. Tenth Judicial Dist. Court, 130 Nev., Adv.

Op. 33, 324 P.3d 369, 373-74 (2014) (noting that district courts have inherent" case-management authority). Lastly, the record demonstrates that the district court considered the appropriate factors and acted within its discretion in determining that appellants' repeated failures to comply with respondents' discovery requests and the district court's November 2013 order warranted dismissal of their complaint. See Young v. Johnny Ribeiro Bldg., Inc., 106 Nev. 88, 92-93, 787 P.2d 777, 779-80 (1990) (recognizing that the district court has the discretion to dismiss a complaint as a discovery sanction so long as certain factors are considered). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

, C.J.

Hardesty

lb J.

Saitta

cc: Ninth Judicial District Court Dept. 2 Michelle Kozlowski Steven John Kozlowski Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger/Reno Douglas County Clerk

'In light of our resolution of this appeal, no action needs to be taken with regard to appellants' October 1, 2014, motion, their October 23, 2014, notice, or their May 14, 2015, motion, and any requests therein are denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A