Nevada Supreme Court, 2015

Franklin v. Laughlin

Franklin v. Laughlin
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 23, 2015

Franklin v. Laughlin

Opinion

Nevada courts are bound to give the decisions of the federal courts preclusive effect in this matter. Semtek Intl Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 531 U.S. 497, 508-09 (2001) (describing the preclusive effect that state courts must give to federal courts acting with diversity jurisdiction); Stoll v. Gottlieb, 305 U.S. 165, 170-71 (1938) (describing the preclusive effect that states must give federal courts acting with federal question jurisdiction); Five Star Capital Corp. v. Ruby, 124 Nev. 1048, 1055, 194 P.3d 709, 713 (2008) (applying issue preclusion where the issues are identical, the issues were actually and necessarily litigated, and a final ruling on the merits was issued). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Gibbons

J.

cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. J Charles Thompson, Senior Judge Bobby L. Franklin Jolley Urga Wirth Woodbury & Little Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.