equitable relief after NRCP 60(b)'s time period has expired, Doan, 130 Nev., Adv. Op. 48, 327 P.3d at 501-02, such relief was not warranted here since the assets were actually adjudicated. An asset is adjudicated if the parties had a fair opportunity to litigate the division of the property. Id. at 502. Here, the district court specifically found that the property at issue had been previously litigated and adjudicated in the divorce decree, and substantial evidence supports the district court's determination. The record indicates that appellant had a fair opportunity to litigate the division of each of the assets he identifies, and the divorce decree disposes of the categories of property appellant contends were left undivided.

Appellant's assertion that certain property was not explicitly named in the divorce decree is inconsequential, because the fact that an asset was not mentioned in the decree is not an exceptional circumstance justifying equitable relief. Id. at 503.

Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 1

I- SIl . a.

Saitta

Gibbon's Pickering gdeu , J.

'Appellant's requests for relief regarding fees and costs are denied.

Edwards v. Emperor's Garden Rest., 122 Nev. 317, 330 n.38, 130 P.3d 1280, 1288 n.38 (2006) (providing that this court need not consider claims that are not cogently argued or supported by relevant authority).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 10) 1947A eD cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Brian P. Hunt Peter B. Jaquette Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) [947A e