court's finding that SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, had not approved the agreement beyond the expired deadline is supported by substantial evidence and is not clearly erroneous. Id. at 672-73, 119 P.3d at 1257; see NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we deny the petition. NRAP 21(b); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991).

It is so ORDERED.

J Saitta

J.

Pickering

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Hawkins Melendrez, P.C.

Charles L. Geisendorf, Ltd. Howard Kim & Associates Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 19474 7e97,