Lowe (Courtney) v. State
Lowe (Courtney) v. State
Opinion
modify a sentence. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, without considering the merits of any of the claims raised in the motion, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2
Saitta
Piekutlip Gibbons Pickering
cc: Eighth Judicial District Court Dept. 20 Courtney Langston Lowe Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
2 We have reviewed all documents that Lowe has submitted to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that Lowe has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.