Hudson (Joe) v. the Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.
Hudson (Joe) v. the Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.
Opinion
An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 I IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF N EVADA JOE EDWARD HUDSON, No. 67957 Petitianer, i ’ THE "EIGHTH UDICIAL DISTRICT ‘ COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA: IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respopdgnt.
J
ORDER DENYING PETITION is a pro se petition fer a writ of mandamus. Petitianer challenges the validity of his judgment 0f conviction. Withaut deciding upan the merits of any claims raised in the dacumentg submitted in this matter, we decline to» exercise our eriginal jurisdiction. See NBS 34.160; NR8 34.170. Acmrdingly, we ORDER the petitian DENIED.
Gibbens cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District J udge I J 06 Edward Hudson ‘ Attorney" General/Carson City l Clark County District Attflrney I Eighth District Court Clerk 511mm: CDURT at: News; mu»st I ‘ .w 6 — i
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.