adequate remedy at law by way of an appeal should they be convicted, NRS 177.015(3); NRS 177.045 ("Upon the appeal, any decision of the court in an intermediate order or proceeding, forming a part of the record, may be reviewed."), and they have not demonstrated that the district court manifestly abused its discretion in concluding that they did not have an absolute right to the relocation funding pursuant to NRS chapter 342, which they were accused of stealing with forged documentation. See NRS 342.075(1) (providing that the provisions of NRS chapter 342 only apply to those displaced persons and businesses who did not willingly agree to the purchase price offered by the government); see also Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that this court's intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

r5aci.

Saitta

Gibboffs Pickering A ckii4 ' J.

cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Gary A. Modafferi Turco & Draskovich Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A es.