Nevada Supreme Court, 2015

Stevenson v. Cox

Stevenson v. Cox
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided May 29, 2015

Stevenson v. Cox

Opinion

pro se plaintiffs are not excused from holding a case conference). Given these undisputed facts, 1 the district court was within its discretion when it found that compelling and extraordinary circumstances did not exist to justify an extension of NRCP 16.1(e)'s 180-day time frame We therefore ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

arraguirre

Douglas

OnnA, J.

cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge Ronald Alex Stevenson Attorney General/Carson City Pershing County Clerk

'Because these facts were undisputed, they were not "contentions" needing the support of an affidavit under DCR 13(6).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A es.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.