a protected property or liberty interest."); see also Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 486 (1995) ("[D]iscipline in segregated confinement [does] not present the type of atypical, significant deprivation in which a State might conceivably create a liberty interest."); Walker v. Gomez, 370 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004) (recognizing that a prisoner does not have a property or liberty interest in prison employment under the due process clause).

Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

, J.

Parraguirre

J.

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Edwan Thurmond Attorney GenerallCarson City Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CO 1947A aggEOu