Monroe v. State
Monroe v. State
Monroe v. State
Opinion
1158, 1166-67 (9th Cir. 2005) (explaining that a plaintiff suing for racial discrimination must allege facts showing that the defendant acted with discriminatory intent or purpose); Sprouse v. Babcock, 870 F.2d 450, 452 (8th Cir. 1989) (filing of false disciplinary charges is not a constitutional violation unless charges were filed in retaliation for filing a grievance).
Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
—CLICalsa6444res Parraguirie
Douglas
J.
cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Ronald Monroe Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I 947A e
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.