Hagendorf v. Metlife Home Loans
Hagendorf v. Metlife Home Loans
Opinion
appellant's profession.' See Mason-McDuffie Real Estate, Inc. v. Villa Fiore Dev., LLC, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 83, 335 P.3d 211, 214 (2014) (indicating that substantial evidence is "that which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion" (internal quotation omitted)).
Lastly, we conclude that the district court was within its discretion when it determined that appellant had not presented a legally sufficient basis to justify granting appellant's motion for a new trial. See Allstate Ins. Co., 125 Nev. at 308, 212 P.3d at 324. We therefore ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
,J CL--Strair- Parraguirre
, J. erry
cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge Craig A. Hoppe, Settlement Judge Reich Radcliffe & Kuttler, LLP Dempsey Roberts & Smith, Ltd. Weinstein, Pinson & Riley The Castle Law Group, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk
'Assuming that the jury found a violation of NRS 106.105, such a violation would not have necessarily meant that respondent breached the parties' contract.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A el>
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.