Nevada Supreme Court, 2015

Burriola v. Dobrescu

Burriola v. Dobrescu
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided May 19, 2015
Burriola v. Dobrescu

Opinion

An unpublis d order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE NEVADA

ANTHONY J . BURRIOLA, No, 67878

Petitioner, ve. .

THE HONORABLE STEVE L. ‘ L E E

DOBRESCU, DISTRICT JUDGE,

Respondent. MAY 1 9 2015

TRACE K. LlNQEMAN . _ GLERK OF SUPREME CDURT

BY

DE U. CLER ‘

ORDER DENETNG PETITION

This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner seeks a'writ directing the district eeurt to issue a decision in a “petition for relief from human civil rights idoletiuns,” purportedly filed on May 20, 2014. We have reviewed the decumente submitted in this matter, and Witheut deciding upon the merits of any Claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original juriedictinn in this matter. See NR8 34.160.

Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

RM, J.

Parraguirre , _ 7 i *0 ,4’ ‘1 m JJ. ‘J.

Douglas : ' 81‘1‘}? ’ cc: Anthony J. Burriola

Atterney General/Cereal City

White Pine Ceunty Clerk

SUPREME Count m:

NEVADA (:3; 19m «4%: — — 35"]5371‘1‘

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.