Mendoza (Jorge) v. State, Dep't of Corrections
Mendoza (Jorge) v. State, Dep't of Corrections
Opinion
An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JORGE MENDOZA, No. 67739 Petitioner, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA ‘ F! L E @ DEPARTMEN’I‘ OF (.3ORREUI‘IONS, Respondent. MAY 1 3 2W5 TRRClE K LINDEMAN CLERK‘S SUPREME COURT BY ‘ DE TY CLERK ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner
seeks an order compelling respondent to abide by the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. W e have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter; and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdietien in this matter. See NBS 34.160; NR8 34.170. Accordingly? we ORDER the petitien DENIED.
Parraguirre finned re _v Douglas C herrjg cc: J urge Mendoza Attorney Generalx’C arson Cit}; Pershing: County Clerk Supreme COURT er NEVADA {0) mm l 2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.