Carley (Elizabeth) v. State
Opinion
An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 SUPREME COURT m:
NEVADA my WM};
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ELIZABETH KAY CARLEY, No. 6?791
Appellant,
VS.
THE STATE OF NEVADA I L E D
Respondent. MAY 11:8 2015 ’ mama Kt UNDEMAN
CLERK F UPREME mum
01213312 DISMISSINGI APPEAL am
This is a pm 3e appeal from a purported decision denying a pastnconviction petitian far a writ of habeas corpus Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark Caunty; Douglas Smith, Judge.
The notice of appeal was filed April 13, 2015. The documents submitted with this appeal indicate that the district court has not entered its decision, either eral or written, to finally resolve a pastaconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Because appellant failed t0 designate an appealable order, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSEDi
Saitta * J_ pick“ w ,J,
Gibbs: :5 Pickering cc: Hon. Dauglas Smith, District Judge
Elizabeth Kay Carley
Atterney General/Carson City
Clark Cnunty District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.