Nevada Supreme Court, 2015

Nasby (Brendan) v. State

Nasby (Brendan) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided April 27, 2015

Nasby (Brendan) v. State

Opinion

An unpublis 3UPREME Coum or NEVADA (a) 194m mg?!» ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF N EVADA BRENDAN JAMES NASBY, NH. 67704 Appellant, I FELEB- THE STATE 0F NEVADA, Respandent. APR 2 7 2015 TRACE K. UMElEMAN GLERK 0F SUPREME COURT BY ORDER flISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK, This is a pro se appeal from district court decisions to deny a renewed motion for appointment (if counsel and a motion for leave fif court to file a renewed motion for appnintment of counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kebhart, Judge.

Because no statute Or court rule permits an appeal fmm the aferementioned orders, we lack jurisdiction. Castilla 1;. State, 1D6 Nev. 349; 352, 7923 112:1 1133, 1135 {1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District J udge Brendan James Nasby Attorney GeneralfCarson City Clark Caunty District Atmrney Eighth District Court Clerk 1531mm

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.