Bailey v. Clark Co.

regarding the lack of findings in the district court's June 4, 2014, order, we note that the only sanction imposed on appellant was the dismissal of his complaint. In this regard, we also note that appellant's complaint had already been dismissed as to all named defendants except Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Forensic Lab and Clark County Metropolitan Police Committee on Fiscal Affairs. Because the claims against these defendants were premised on the same nonactionable allegations that had been previously dismissed with respect to the other defendants, appellant's argument does not warrant reversal. We therefore ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

, J. Pickering

2 0n February 24, 2015, appellant filed two requests for judicial notice. Because the first request asks that this court take judicial notice of documents that are already part of the record on appeal, no further action needs to be taken with respect to this request. Because the second request asks that this court take judicial notice of documents that were not presented to the district court, that request is denied. See Carson Ready Mix, Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank of Nev., 97 Nev. 474, 476-77, 635 P.2d 276, 277 (1981) (noting that this court may only consider matters appearing in the record on appeal).

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A e cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge

Anthony Dewane Bailey

North Las Vegas City Attorney

Clark County District Attorney

Olson, Cannon, Gormley, Angulo & Stoberski Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A