Stewart v. State
Opinion
process claim. See Hudson, 468 U.S. at 533. Although appellant also asserted that his Fourth Amendment right to be free from an illegal seizure was violated, this allegation essentially restated his due process claim, and regardless, the Fourth Amendment does not apply within the confines of a prison cell. Id. at 528 & n.8. Thus, his illegal seizure claim fails for the same reason as his due process claim. See id. at 526, 533. To the extent that appellant asserted a state tort claim for negligence, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider such a claim based on the facts alleged, as the value of the property at issue was well under $10,000. See NRS 4.370(1)(b) (justice courts have jurisdiction over actions for detaining or damaging personal property valued under $10,000); see also Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6(1) (district courts "have original jurisdiction in all cases excluded by law from the original jurisdiction of justices' courts"). As appellant could not establish either a constitutional claim or a state tort claim within the district court's jurisdiction under the facts alleged in the complaint, dismissal was proper, see Buzz Stew, 124 Nev. at 228, 181 P.3d at 672, and we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. ,c).--; A -
1. -
Saitta
Gibbons Pickering cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge
Demetrious Stewart
Attorney General/Carson City
Carson City Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947e)
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.