Nevada Supreme Court, 2015

In re: Discipline of Barry Levinson

In re: Discipline of Barry Levinson
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 3, 2015
In re: Discipline of Barry Levinson

Opinion

full knowledge that if the State Bar were to prosecute his case, he could not successfully defend against the charges.

Pursuant to SCR 112(1), an attorney who is the subject of an investigation or proceeding involving allegations of misconduct may consent to disbarment by submitting the requisite affidavit. Levinson's affidavit meets the requirements of SCR 112(1). Therefore, the petition for disbarment by consent is granted. SCR 112(2). Barry Levinson is hereby disbarred. The parties shall comply with the applicable provisions of SCR 115 and SCR 121.1 regarding notice and publication.

It is so ORDERED. friset^- , C.J.

Hardesty

(2LA, ocCi

Parraguirre

Saitta Gibbons cc: Bar Counsel

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Jeffrey Albregts, Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board E. Brent Bryson Barry Levinson Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.