In Re: Discipline of Randolph Goldberg
In Re: Discipline of Randolph Goldberg
Opinion
The findings and recommendations of a disciplinary hearing panel, though persuasive, are not binding on this court. In re Discipline of Stuhff, 108 Nev. 629, 633, 837 P.2d 853, 855 (1992). The automatic review of a panel decision recommending a suspension is conducted de novo, requiring the exercise of independent judgment by this court. Id.; see SCR 105(3)(b).
Based on our review of the record, the suspension recommendation is insufficient in relation to Goldberg's admitted conduct.
Accordingly, we reject the conditional guilty plea agreement and remand this matter to the Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board for further proceedings.
It is so ORDERED.
Hardesty
Parraguirre tfi J.
Saitta
Gibbons
cc: Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board Michael J. Warhola, LLC Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA AP 1 ,147A TER#D
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.