Mayo v. Monje
Mayo v. Monje
Opinion
An unpublishd order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ARTHUR DANIEL name, No. 68803 Appellan’tz, ve. k.
OFELIA L. MONJE, D.D.A.; STEVEN B. F E L E E} WOLFSON, DA; ERIKA D. BALLOU, D.P.D.; AND PHILIP JLKOHN, amen, SEP 2 8 2015 —--—- TRACE K, LFNUEMAN CLERK OF super—35:5 CDURT av A DEPUTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro ee appeal from an order dismissing appellant’s I complaint. Our review ef the documents submitted to this court pursuant to N RAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that it was prematurely filed, before the entry of afina]. written judgment, and is % therefore of no. effect” See NRA? 4430(1); Rust LL Clark Cty. Scheol IS‘ieltmlcrtg 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987). Accerclingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
cc: Hon. James CJi'cmlszetl;3 District Judge Arthur Daniel Maya Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Ceurt Clerk fiummfi Guam a?
Harem :0; 19m. «@5- t r
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.