the time of any reinstatement proceedings concerning Rosenfeld.

Accordingly, we remand this matter to the Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board for further proceedings.' It is so ORDERED. 2

• P a rr a guirre

C ktft Gibbons

'As the recommendations that (1) Rosenfeld be suspended for five years retroactive to October 30, 2013; and (2) as a condition precedent to applying for reinstatement. Rosenfeld must pay the entire amount of restitution identified in the agreement appear appropriate, this court would be inclined to approve a revised conditional guilty plea including such provisions, without the other extensive conditions in the current agreement.

In light of these proceedings, we will take no further action on the documents regarding Rosenfeld filed in Docket No. 64288 indicating that suspension and/or disability inactive status might be appropriate as a result of Rosenfeld's actions and almost immediate subsequent hospitalization and withdrawal from practicing law. Additionally, this order .constitutes our final disposition of this matter. Any further proceedings concerning Rosenfeld shall be docketed as a new matter.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A en. cc: Landis Law Group State Bar of Nevada/Las Vegas Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Directer, State Bar of Nevada Jeffrey R. Albregts Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1.947A ec.