Nevada Supreme Court, 2015

Peck (Frank) v. State

Peck (Frank) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 2015

Peck (Frank) v. State

Opinion

An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA FRANK MILFORD PECK, No. 68825 Petitioner, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, F E L E Resgendent. q” OCT i § 2315 TRAle Pf. LFNDEMAN CLEFM CF SaJPQEifiE COURT 3v 3- ORDER DENYING PETITION afieu‘rtfizem This is a pro se petition for a writ 0f prohibition. Petitioner

asserts that the district ceurt has mishandled filings in the district ceurt.

We have reviewed the dncumente submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits ef any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NBS 34.320; NRS 34.380. ‘ Accordingly, we ORDER. the petition DENIED.

I? , J, Pickering cc: Frank Milferd Peck Attorney General/C arsen City Waehoe County District Attorney Waehoe District Court Clerk 51:91am: Gaum' OF NEVADA i’ “A “W 52313557 ,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.