conclude that he failed to demonstrate that the restitution award was based on impalpable or highly suspect evidence. See Martinez v. State, 115 Nev. 9, 12-13, 974 P.2d 133, 135 (1999); see also Major v. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 70, 333 P.3d 235, 238 (2014) (noting that a district court must rely on reliable and accurate information in calculating a restitution award). The record indicates that the victims reported losses of over $13,000 and the presentence investigation report's detailed accounting established the amount of losses at $4,176.46. Therefore, the district court relied on reasonably reliable and accurate evidence in setting restitution.

Having considered Fitzsimmons' contentions, and concluded that they lack merit, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

(Sidi , J.

Saitta

J.

cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge Law Office of Thomas L. Qualls, Ltd. Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 0