Nevada Supreme Court, 2015

In Re: Discipline of Robert Fry

In Re: Discipline of Robert Fry
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided October 22, 2015

In Re: Discipline of Robert Fry

Opinion

estate, or a personal representative throughout the course of his suspension and thereafter; and (4) pay the costs of the investigation, preparation of hearing materials, and disciplinary hearings within six months. The hearing panel accepted the amended conditional guilty plea agreement and recommended the agreed-upon discipline.

Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the guilty plea agreement should be approved. See SCR 113(1). We hereby impose a four-year suspension retroactive to the date that Fry was temporarily suspended under SCR 111 (March 27, 2014). Additionally, Fry must comply with all of the conditions in the plea agreement, as outlined above.

The parties shall comply with the applicable provisions of SCR 115 and SCR 121.1.

It is so ORDERED.

, C.J.

Hardesty

Parraguir-rf0-

Gibbons

Pidem. t J.

Pickering

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A ,0ter, SAITTA, J., dissenting: I dissent because the agreed-upon discipline is insufficient in relation to Fry's admitted conduct. I therefore would reject the conditional guilty plea agreement.

J.

Saitta

cc: Chair, Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Stan Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A ern

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.