Metlife Home Loans v. Hagendorf
Metlife Home Loans v. Hagendorf
Opinion
An unpublish : d order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
SUPREME Coum’ OF NEVADA go} my on.» IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA METLIFE HOME LOANS, A DIVISION No. 66901 OF METLIFE BANK, N .A., i ll 9 e five ant. F WAYNE HAGENDORF, Remndem. _ NOV 1 3 2015 TRACK“, K, I ll‘JUEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME comer BY
DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DI SMI SSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court order declining to diSSOlVE a preliminary injunction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Stefan}? h’liley, Judge.
In light of this court’s dispoaition in Docket No. 65392, the.
ISSUES raised. in this appeal are moot. See Persorifiood New. 0. Bristol, 126 Nev. 599, 60:2, 245 P.3d, 57:2, 574 (2010) (“The question of mootness is one of justioiahility. This court’s duty is not to render advisory opinions but, rather, to resolve actual contrOversies . . . 5’). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
C.J.
Hardesty
cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge W einstein 35 Riley, PS.
DempEEy Roberts & Smith, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk IS'BHLMI
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.