Carey v. Curti Ranch Two Maint. Ass'n., Inc.
Carey v. Curti Ranch Two Maint. Ass'n., Inc.
Opinion
An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 SUPREME Ccyua‘r 9F NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER _ 1mm: «mm
IN THE SUPREME COURT 0F THE STATE OF NEVADA GUILLERMO E. CAREY, I No. 65752 Appellant, vs. CURTI RANCH TWO MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATTON, INC; ALESSI 8; KOENIG, LLC; AND SFR ; FELE
INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, NOV 1 3 2815' Ewmfi “ -x S 0 en ‘1 4 “Egg: {ELSEPLAEREng‘gUPT BY gt. “
DEPLJ I "f CLERK.
ORDER DISMISSEer APPEAL Pursuant to the stipulation 0f the parties, and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed; The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 4200).
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN cc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge Debbie Leonard, Settlement Judge Reno Law Group, LLC The Clarkson Law Gmujp, RC.
Alessi 8; Koenig, LLC Howard Kim 8: Associates Washoe District Calm: Clerk (54-3530}
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.