In response, appellants argue that the order appealed from was the final judgment because it resolved respondents' cause of action for attorney fees and determined that they were the prevailing party entitled to such fees. We disagree. Because the order appealed from did not establish an amount of fees, but instead set a future hearing date to determine an appropriate amount of fees, the order is not appealable.' Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 2

1C241)Wr .

Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Leon Aberasturi, District Judge Laurie A. Yott, Settlement Judge Leverty & Associates Law, Chtd.

Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd. Third District Court Clerk Supreme Court Law Librarian

IWe note that appellants have filed an appeal from the district court's order awarding a specific amount of fees and costs, docketed in this court as Docket No. 68776. Appellants are free to raise issues regarding respondents' entitlement to fees in the context of that appeal.

2 Appellants' motion to consolidate this appeal with Docket No. 68776 is denied as moot. The conditional sanction imposed against appellants' counsel is hereby vacated.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1547A